Tuesday, November 06, 2007

How to teach about dominance

Yesterday the team of people teaching BIOL 121 had our second meeting to discuss our new learning objectives. One issue that hadn't been included in the list of objectives is dominance. I added it to the list on our Instructors' Blog, stated as follows:
Students should be able to define dominance as a particular relationship between the effects of two alleles; dominance is said to exist when the phenotype of the heterozygote is the same as that of a homozygote for one of the alleles (the 'dominant' one). They should also be able to explain that dominance usually results when a single copy of the normal allele is sufficient to give the normal phenotype when combined with a defective allele, and to predict phenotypes when given such information.
Students find this very difficult, I think mainly because they are encouraged in high school to blindly accept "Mendel's Rules", and think of dominance as resulting from some mysterious gene inactivation process. At the meeting I put forward the way I have been trying to teach this concept. I was (slightly) mortified to discover how many assumptions my explanation relied on (assumptions fortunately not shared by my colleagues), so I've been trying to build a better explanatory framework, using ideas they raised.

Here are the figures I would use. The first three figures would be introduced at the end of the first class about how genotypes determine phenotypes (yes, I know that's an oversimplification that ignores the massive effect of environment in real organisms...).

Figure 1: Introduce lactase and lactose intolerance:

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


Figure 2: Show a graph of how lactose digestion depends on the amount of lactase:

Students may need to be told that each tube contains the same amount of lactose.

(I don't know if students should be told that this is fake data.)
.
.
.
.
Figure 3: Show the questions I'll ask about this information at the start of the next class.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Here are the figures I would show at the start of the next class:

Figure 4: Show the first question again.

Students could be asked this question first, before being given the guidance suggested on the next figures.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Figure 5: Remind them of the graphed data.

I've made the original graph pale, and superimposed on it the labels and numbers appropriate to thinking about the amounts of lactase in adults.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Figure 6: Add bars showing how much lactose would be digested by each amount of lactase.

Students could be guided by asking them how high these bars should be.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Figure 7:

Now we're back to the original question. After the guidance all students should be able to see that adults with 5µg/ml lactase digest lactose almost as well as adults with 10µg/ml lactase.
.
.
.
.
.
Figure 8:

This question is intended to connect their understanding of genotypes to phenotypes. The answers should be: 0 = -/-, 5 = +/-, 10 = +/+.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Figure 9:

The +/- heterozygotes have almost as much ability to digest lactose as the +/+ homozygotes. So they will be lactose-tolerant, and we will describe the + allele as being dominant to the - allele.

This is a lot of figures. Ideally the students would have the time to try to figure most of the steps out themselves; the figures are my ideas of the steps their thinking should take.

This lesson should also build the idea that dominance and recessiveness are not properties of alleles in isolation, but properties of relationships between pairs of alleles.

I usually tell students to ignore confusing terms like 'partial dominance' and 'incomplete dominance' and 'co-dominance', and to instead just describe any other interactions between alleles and phenotypes using more informative descriptions such as 'blending' (e.g. many pigments) or 'both phenotypes are present' (e.g. blood types A and B).

The numbers on the graphs are made-up data. Real human lactase assays are usually normalized to the ratio of sucrase to lactase, which is too confusing to present here. But here's a nice graph showing how lactase levels decline and sucrase levels rise in rats (from a page by R. Bowen at Colorado State).

3 comments:

Tamara said...

I found a neat little article on changing our approach to teaching Mendelian genetics, and in the process "un-confounding" our students about dominance. The article by Douglas Allchin raises some misconceptions that we perpetuate about dominance (& Mendelian genetics in general) simply by the order in which we teach the material.
Dominance is not the most frequent type of Mendelian inheritance; in fact it is the exception, not the rule, with codominance occurring twice as often as dominance. And yet, we teach dominance first and then codominance, incomplete dominance and the rest as the exceptions.
Allchin makes three suggestions, the first of which, is that we begin teaching Mendelian genetics (that is segregation of alleles, etc) using cases where there is no dominance. If one of Mendel's great accomplishments was to disprove the hypothesis of blending inheritance, then we should use examples where one can see both traits emerge in the F2 generation after a "blended" phenotype in the F1 generation. (This eliminates the idea that alleles from the two parents "compete" or that one drives the other one to submission.)
Some people have taken exception to Allchin's articles (as he strongly criticises our portrayal of historic scientists), but I believe he may be on to something. If we flip the order of what we're teaching it may be far easier to get our point across. By teaching dominance first, we emphasise that it is the primary state, when this is, in no way, true. I've copied the link to the article (which is in The American Biology Teacher, Vol 62, Issue 9, Nov 2000):
http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?SESSID=69b2877e7657a0bc5a123dbdb6aee07d&request=get-document&doi=10.1662%2F0002-7685(2000)062%5B0632%3AMM%5D2.0.CO%3B2

Tamara

Rosie Redfield said...

That's a very sensible suggestion; I haven't explicitl;y done that int he past but I will this year. We should push this issue for 121, and provide a list of suitable examples that display either blending or both-phenotypes (e.g. blood groups).

In general the genetics objectives developed for 121 reflect a very conservative approach to genetics - teaching the students what has traditionally been taught, rather than what today's students really will need to use. I think it's not to late to change them.

Manjot kaur said...

Thanks a lot for sharing such a good source with all, i appreciate your efforts taken for the same. I found this worth sharing and must share this with all.


Best OET Coaching for Nurses in Adelaide
OET Training in Adelaide
OET Coaching in Adelaide